News Release

Contact

Brian Imus,
Illinois PIRG

Illinois Receives a “B-” in Annual Report on Transparency of Government Spending

For Immediate Release

Chicago– Illinois received a “B-“ when it comes to government spending transparency, according to "Following the Money 2012: How the States Rank on Providing Online Access to Government Spending Data," the third annual report of its kind by the Illinois PIRG Education Fund.

“State governments across the country continue to be more transparent about where our tax money goes, extending checkbook-level disclosure of data on spending to contracting, tax subsidies, development incentives and other expenditures,” said Brian Imus, State Director with Illinois PIRG. “But Illinois still has plenty of room for improvement.”

Officials from Illinois and 46 other states provided the researchers with feedback on their initial evaluation of state transparency websites. The leading states with the most comprehensive transparency websites are Texas, Kentucky, Indiana, Louisiana, Massachusetts, West Virginia, and Arizona. 

Based an inventory of the content and accessibility of states' transparency websites, Following the Money 2012 assigns each state a grade of "A" to "F." The report describes Illinois as an "emerging state," but still not a leader due to serious deficiencies. For example, Illinois' website lacks comprehensive contract information and links to local government budgets.

The good news is that Illinois is currently the only state that provides, through its transparency website, information on both the projected benefits and the actual benefits created from economic development subsidies.

Since last year’s Following the Money report, there has been remarkable progress across the country with new states providing online access to government spending information and several states pioneering new tools to further expand citizens’ access to government spending information. 

This year’s report found that 46 states now provide an online database of government expenditures with “checkbook-level” detail, a major increase from 32 states two years ago. Twenty nine state transparency websites now provide information on government expenditures through tax code deductions, exemptions and credits – up from eight states two years ago.

“Citizens expect information to be at their fingertips the way they can view their cellphone minutes or the location of a package. Putting spending information online helps hold government accountable and allows taxpayers to see where the money goes,” said Imus.

The states with the most transparent spending generally include data on economic development subsidies, expenditures granted through the tax code, and quasi-public agencies. Eight states have launched brand new transparency websites or online tools since last year’s report. Many more have made improvements to existing websites that are documented in the report.  The best state transparency tools were highly searchable, engaged citizens, and included detailed usable information.

States that have created or improved their online transparency have typically done so with little upfront cost.   In fact, states with top-flight transparency websites actually save money for taxpayers, while also restoring public confidence in government, and preventing misspending and pay-to-play contracts.

"The state of Illinois should continually improve access to online information about government spending,” said Imus, “Given our state budget problems, Illinoisans need to be able to follow the money.”

To read the full report, go here.

Support Us

Your donation supports Illinois PIRG’s work to stand up for consumers on the issues that matter, especially when powerful interests are blocking progress.

Consumer Alerts

Join our network and stay up to date on our campaigns, get important consumer updates and take action on critical issues.
Optional Member Code



Illinois PIRG is part of The Public Interest Network, which operates and supports organizations committed to a shared vision of a better world and a strategic approach to social change.