News Release

Contact

Brian Imus,
Illinois PIRG

Health Care Repeal Would Have Costly Consequences for Illinois Consumers and Small Businesses

For Immediate Release

Consumers and small businesses in Illinois will face significantly higher insurance premiums and could see costly coverage denials and price discrimination if efforts to repeal the federal health care law prevail in Congress or in the courts, according to The Cost of Repeal: Examining the Impact on Illinois of Repealing the New Federal Health Care Law, a new report released today by Illinois PIRG.

According to the report, in the short term, repeal would strip tax credits from 159,900 Illinois small businesses. And over the longer term, the cost of offering employer-based health insurance could jump by more than $3000 a year over current law.

“In today’s economy, the higher costs that would result from repeal are the last thing that Illinois consumers and businesses need,” said Brian Imus, Illinois PIRG State Director.

The new Illinois PIRG report draws on data from independent sources, including the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, other government agencies, business groups and health analysts, and finds the following:

·         Repealing the new state health insurance exchange would drive premiums on the individual market up to 20% higher for the same coverage by 2016.

·         Without the new law’s insurance reforms, the 2,525,000 of Illinois residents who have pre-existing conditions, ranging from asthma to cancer, will continue to face coverage denials and price discrimination when purchasing their own insurance.

·         Rolling back last year’s law would drive up employer health costs, leading to 17,755 fewer jobs created per year in Illinois by the end of the decade.

·         Outright repeal would pull $29.3 billion in federal Medicaid dollars out of the state's economy by the end of the decade and terminate establishment or expansion of 570 community health centers across Illinois.

The U.S. House of Representatives is scheduled to vote later this month on a bill to repeal the new law outright.  And Washington's intensely partisan debate over health care threatens to spill over to Springfield as Governor Quinn and state legislators consider key implementation decisions.

The Cost of Repeal recommends a set of pro-active policy changes on which supporters and opponents of last year’s health care law should be able to find common ground.  These include:

1.      Using the substantial authority the state has under current law to design a health insurance exchange that is adapted to meet the needs of our state’s markets, consumers, and businesses.

    Taking additional steps to contain health care costs, like using information technology to ensure that doctors receive the latest research about which treatments are most effective – at the patient’s bedside. 

3.      Crack down on balance-billing, a practice whereby hospitals or providers accept payment from a patient’s insurance plan, then charge additional amounts-above and beyond the usual co-pays and cost sharing.

"Before our elected officials join this headlong rush to repeal in Washington, they should consider the consequences for our state, and look for solutions that hold down costs, not increase them," said Imus.

Defend the CFPB

Tell your senators to oppose the “Financial CHOICE Act,” which would gut Wall Street reforms and destroy the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau as we know it.

Support Us

Your donation supports Illinois PIRG’s work to stand up for consumers on the issues that matter, especially when powerful interests are blocking progress.

Consumer Alerts

Join our network and stay up to date on our campaigns, get important consumer updates and take action on critical issues.
Optional Member Code